Because biographies of famous scientists tend to edit out their mistakes, we underestimate the degree of risk they were willing to take. And because anything a famous scientist did that wasn’t a mistake has probably now become the conventional wisdom, those choices don’t seem risky either.
Biographies of Newton, for example, understandably focus more on physics than alchemy or theology. The impression we get is that his unerring judgment led him straight to truths no one else had noticed. How to explain all the time he spent on alchemy and theology? Well, smart people are often kind of crazy.
But maybe there is a simpler explanation. Maybe the smartness and the craziness were not as separate as we think. Physics seems to us a promising thing to work on, and alchemy and theology obvious wastes of time. But that’s because we know how things turned out. In Newton’s day the three problems seemed roughly equally promising. No one knew yet what the payoff would be for inventing what we now call physics; if they had, more people would have been working on it. And alchemy and theology were still then in the category Marc Andreessen would describe as “huge, if true.”
Newton made three bets. One of them worked. But they were all risky.
Ultimate Salad with Protein
- 3 Cups Spinach
- 2 Cups Chopped Onions and peppers
- 2 Jalepenos Chopped
- Half a Cucumber
- 1 Carrot
- 2 Cups Chicken (grilled) or Shrimp
- 1/2 Cup Almonds or nut of your choice
Throw Contents in large Bowl and use a Pizza Cutter to cut up and mix together, Serve with an Asian Ginger Sesame Low Sugar Dressing